Is a class representative required to show some basis in fact for each of the certification requirements?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Miller v. Merck Frosst Canada Ltd., 2011 BCSC 1759 (CanLII):

Whether the class representative must show some basis in fact for each of the certification requirements is addressed by determining whether additional information is required for the certification hearing bearing in mind that the concern at this stage is limited to procedure, not the merits of the claim (Jones v. Zimmer, 2010 BCSC 1504, para. 22).

Other Questions


What are the requirements for certification of a class? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for representing a class in a class action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the requirements for class certification in a settlement? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can certification be refused for a class A class B contract that includes two separate contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an evidentiary basis for each of the requirements for certification? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a class of individuals who entered into transactions after May 8, 1997 be certified as a class? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the definition of a class and what is the criteria for defining a class? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for adding plaintiffs to a proposed class action where the named and proposed representative plaintiff has no legitimate cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a personal representative of the deceased's estate make a claim under s. 151(3) of the BC Supreme Court of Justice for personal representative leave to continue to pursue his claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a class member entitled to an opt-out from a settlement offer made directly to the class member? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.