Where prejudice has been found to be prejudice against a plaintiff in a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Regina N., In re, 117 Cal.App.3d 577, 172 Cal.Rptr. 810 (Cal. App. 1981):
Where the rights are not of constitutional dimension, prejudice is to be tested by application of People v. Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818, 299 P.2d 243.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been successful in asserting that a plaintiff is a plaintiff in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law in which a plaintiff has been found to be in breach of his right to speak freely in a public office? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a plaintiff has been found guilty of malice under section 3294 of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found to have improperly used a judge's comments in a federal civil case to justify a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found to have improperly used a judge's comments in a federal civil case to justify a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
