California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Williams v. Security First Nat. Bank of Los Angeles, 153 Cal.App.2d Supp. 900, 314 P.2d 1020 (Cal. Super. 1957):
One point briefed by both parties was the question of whether or not since the 1927 amendment to Section 161a of the Civil Code, the wife would have the right at all to testify. The respondent cites Manford v. Coats, 6 Cal.App.2d 743, 45 P.2d 395, for the proposition that the wife, in view of her interest, would not be entitled to testify. However, the point was not decided in that case, as nothing is decided in a case except what is presented by the record and the issues. All the court did was intimate how it might hold if it were called upon to rule; and it seems from all the decisions cited by the appellant that the wife is not prohibited from testifying in a proper case. Subdivision 3 of Section 1880 does not purport to prohibit anybody having
Page 1022
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.