When will the court uphold the factual findings of a jury in an assault case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Nampula, E055708 (Cal. App. 2013):
We uphold the trial court's factual findings because they are supported by substantial evidence in the record. (People v. Massie, supra, 19 Cal.4th at p. 576.)
Page 19
(c) Implied threats of further harassment of defendant's family
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When will the court uphold the factual findings of a jury in an assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's recent finding that a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of perverting the course of justice in a sexual assault case has been found guilty of a similar charge in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal in the Superior Court of California in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court ruling that resolves conflicts in the evidence entitled to greater deference from a reviewing court than a similar finding in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with civil cases dealing with sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a de novo review of the findings of the Court of Appeal of a finding that a plaintiff was sexually assaulted during her pregnancy? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of Justice on Beach's appeal against a finding that an autopsy photograph of the victim was unduly prejudicial and lacked probative value? (California, United States of America)
