California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Conservatorship of Roulet, 152 Cal.Rptr. 425, 23 Cal.3d 219, 590 P.2d 1 (Cal. 1979):
In criminal trials, proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is an obstacle the state [590 P.2d 3] places in its own way, in order to lessen the possibility of convicting an innocent person. This procedural constraint is eloquent testimony to the high stakes involved a defendant's freedom and reputation hinge on the verdict. In People v. Burnick (1975) 14 Cal.3d 306, 319-322, 121 Cal.Rptr. 488, 535 P.2d 352, this court explicitly recognized that civil commitment to a mental hospital, despite its civil label, threatens a person's liberty and dignity on as massive a scale as that traditionally associated with criminal prosecutions. One has only to imagine the horror experienced by a competent person falsely committed as mentally disturbed in order to appreciate that freedom is openly on trial at a civil commitment proceeding. Therefore, the Burnick court ruled that proof beyond a reasonable doubt applies to mentally disordered sex offender proceedings.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.