When will a jury find that prejudicial juror misconduct invalidated the count 7 verdict?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Carmalt, H038402 (Cal. App. 2016):

double jeopardy, and (2) that prejudicial juror misconduct invalidated the count 7 verdict. The double jeopardy motion was successful and not attributable to ignorance, fraud, or mistake. But defendant presses that the doctrine's remaining element, which requires the "conflicting positions [to] be clearly inconsistent so that one necessarily excludes the other" (Jackson v. County of Los Angeles (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 171, 182), is not satisfied here.

Other Questions


In reviewing a motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct based on Juror misconduct, what is the effect of the finding on the credibility of the jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a juror's misconduct was prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
Does the failure to conduct a timely inquiry into juror misconduct constitute prejudicial error? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1123 of the Penal Code allow for a mistrial where a juror's illness or other good cause causes the juror to be unable to perform his duty and there are no alternate jurors? (California, United States of America)
Does a juror's misstatement of residency constitute prejudicial misconduct? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances can a defense counsel request to conduct a post-verdict investigation of juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Can a failure to object to prosecutorial misconduct be excused when the misconduct "contributed materially to the verdict"? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury be compelled to testify at a post-verdict evidentiary hearing regarding allegations of juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Does a juror's failure to object at trial affect their claim that the court failed to properly investigate juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's failure to question each juror privately regarding a juror misconduct claim an issue of abuse of power not one of constitutional significance? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.