California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Carmalt, H038402 (Cal. App. 2016):
double jeopardy, and (2) that prejudicial juror misconduct invalidated the count 7 verdict. The double jeopardy motion was successful and not attributable to ignorance, fraud, or mistake. But defendant presses that the doctrine's remaining element, which requires the "conflicting positions [to] be clearly inconsistent so that one necessarily excludes the other" (Jackson v. County of Los Angeles (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 171, 182), is not satisfied here.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.