The following excerpt is from Rau v. United States, 260 F. 131 (2nd Cir. 1919):
The acceptance, not only of the tax, but of the penalty, coupled with the statement of the internal revenue officer, that payment would end the matter, and that there would be no indictment, if true, would be a good defense. The fact that the money was retained by the United States is some evidence of its acceptance in compromise. We believe that under the facts disclosed in this record, as far as the defendant was permitted to show them, it was required of the court to submit as a question of fact to the jury, under proper instructions, whether or not a compromise was entered into. It was not a question of law for the District Judge. As was said in United States v. Chouteau, 102 U.S. 603, 26 L.Ed. 246:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.