California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Tolhurst, 139 Cal.App.3d 1, 188 Cal.Rptr. 474 (Cal. App. 1982):
We acknowledge that the quantity and quality of the contraband seized is always relevant to the issue of whether narcotics are held for sale or personal use (People v. Shipstead (1971) 19 Cal.App.3d 58, 77, 96 Cal.Rptr. 513), and that persons charged with drug offenses have a significant interest in having an opportunity to examine, and perhaps have chemical tests performed on, evidence to be offered against them. (See People v. Backus (1979) 23 Cal.3d 360, 384, 152 Cal.Rptr. 710, 590 P.2d 837.) The state may not arbitrarily deny such a right or foreclose a defendant from securing potentially favorable evidence. (See People v. Nation (1980) 26 Cal.3d 169, 176, 161 Cal.Rptr. 299, 604 P.2d 1051.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.