The following excerpt is from Heilman v. Wasko, No. 2:12-cv-01966 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. 2015):
16. Moreover, defendant's requests and the administrative decisions supporting them were narrowly tailored to achieve the legitimate objectives of ensuring defendant's safety and maintaining institutional security. See Pratt, 65 F. 3d at 806 (defendant's challenged conduct will overcome a retaliation claim if it advanced a legitimate correctional goal that was tailored narrowly enough to achieve the goal); see also Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 (1987) (test for determining whether a prison regulation that impinges on an inmate's constitutional rights is valid because reasonably related to legitimate penological interests).
17. When a court decides that plaintiff's allegations do not support a constitutional violation, it need not reach defendant's qualified immunity defense. Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 201 (2001).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.