When will a court grant a defendant's request to represent himself at trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Perez, E073399 (Cal. App. 2020):

First, the trial court could reasonably conclude defendant had some proclivity to vacillate with respect to representation by counsel. Defendant had already discharged his original counsel and opted to represent himself at the time of his preliminary hearing, only to change his mind shortly before his originally scheduled trial date. Further, defendant requested to represent himself during pretrial motions, only to withdraw the request shortly thereafter. Thus, the trial court could reasonably conclude this factor weighed against granting defendant's request. (People v. Jenkins (2000) 22 Cal.4th 900, 962 [The trial court "could reasonably conclude that defendant . . . had some proclivity to

Page 11

vacillate with respect to representation by counsel" based solely on one prior request and withdrawal.].)

Other Questions


When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant's request to represent himself was granted, when the trial court appointed a defense investigator, legal runner, and standby counsel, as well as granting pro. per. funds and telephone access, is he entitled to reversal? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court have any discretion in denying a defendant's request to represent himself? (California, United States of America)
How has the trial court treated a motion to suppress a motion by a public defender appointed to represent defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial have to be granted because the trial court refused to grant a motion to sever? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial have to be granted because the trial court refused to grant a motion to sever? (California, United States of America)
When will a court grant a defendant an instruction that cautions the jury that it may not draw an adverse inference from the fact that a defendant has not testified at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.