When will a court allow an objection on Fifth Amendment grounds?

Appellant asserts that an objection on Fifth Amendment grounds was excused because it would have been futile. (See People v. Wilson (2008) 44 Cal.4th 758, 793 ["A litigant need not object . . . if doing so would be futile"].) Appellant argues that an objection would have been futile since "the trial court's advisement of [appellant's] rights to testify or not testify did not adequately state the law because it did not include the advisement that a defendant does not waive Fifth Amendment rights merely by taking the stand as a witness." Appellant's argument is illogical, unsupported by citation to the record or legal authority, and wrong on the law. (See People v. Saddler (1979) 24 Cal.3d 671, 679 ["a defendant who takes the stand and testifies in his behalf waives his Fifth Amendment privilege [citation] . . . to the extent of the scope of relevant cross-examination"].) Appellant has therefore not satisfied his burden of showing that an objection would have been futile. (See People ex rel. Reisig v. Acuna (2017) 9 Cal.App.5th 1, 25.)