The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Rahm, 993 F.2d 1405 (9th Cir. 1993):
Applying this rule, we have reversed a conviction for bank robbery when testimony was excluded that another man matching the robber's description might have committed the crime. United States v. Armstrong, 621 F.2d 951, 953 (9th Cir.1980). But as we later explained:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.