The following excerpt is from Ioane v. Hodges, 939 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2018):
Finally, the majority cites Sepulveda v. Ramirez , 967 F.2d 1413, 1416 (9th Cir. 1992). In Sepulveda , we held that a male probation officer violated a female probationers right to bodily privacy when the male probation officer observed the female probationer urinating in a bathroom stall during a urinalysis test. 967 F.2d at 1415. This is, without doubt, the most factually analogous case cited by the majority.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.