When a jury asks a question during deliberations, can the court respond by informing the jury on the desired points of law?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Montoya, G056877 (Cal. App. 2020):

When a jury asks a question during deliberations, the trial court must respond by informing the jury on the desired points of law. ( 1138.)1 The court has discretion to respond by referring the jury to the original instructions, if they are full and complete, or by providing additional explanation. (People v. Eid (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 859, 881-882.)

Page 7

Other Questions


When a jury asks a question after retiring for deliberation, does the court have a duty to provide the jury with information the jury desires? (California, United States of America)
When a jury asks a question after retiring for deliberation, does the court have an obligation to provide the jury with information the jury desires? (California, United States of America)
How have the jury been instructed to interpret the meaning of deliberate deliberate deliberate use of the word "deliberately" in the dictionary? (California, United States of America)
When a respondent has not filed a respondents' brief in an appeal, can the court order that the respondent must file his or her own brief? (California, United States of America)
When a jury asks a question after retiring for deliberation, how does the court respond? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defense counsel object to a prosecutor's argument that a witness who withdrew from questioning because she was not engaging with the questioning, is entitled to continue questioning? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.