When a defendant who has been released on bail fails to appear before a judge to plead guilty to a charge under section 1305 of the California Penal Code, what remedies are available to the surety?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Aegis Security Insurance Company, G033588 (CA 2/28/2005), G033588 (Cal. 2005):

When a defendant who has been released on bail fails to appear without a sufficient excuse, the court "shall in open court declare forfeited the undertaking of bail or the money or property deposited as bail . . . ." (Pen. Code, 1305, subd. (a).) Penal Code section 1305 further requires that "the clerk of the court shall, within 30 days of the forfeiture, mail notice of the forfeiture to the surety . . . ." (Pen. Code, 1305, subd. (b).) If the clerk fails to mail the notice within 30 days after forfeiture has been entered, the surety is released from its obligation under the bond. (Ibid.) It is also settled that "[i]f a surety is to be afforded the protections provided by [Penal Code section 1305 the surety] must be advised at an early date of the fact of the forfeiture in order that [the surety] may institute procedures to locate and compel the appearance of the bailee." (People v. United Bonding Ins. Co. (1971) 5 Cal.3d 898, 906.)

Generally, "`a court has jurisdiction over a bail bond from the point that it is issued until the point it is either satisfied, exonerated, or time expires to enter summary judgment after forfeiture.'" (People v. American Contractors Indemnity, Co. (2004) 33 Cal.4th 653, 663.) But in a case where the defendant has failed to appear without sufficient excuse, the court loses its jurisdiction to order the bail forfeited unless it does so in open court at the time of the failure to appear. (People v. United Bonding Ins. Co., supra, 5 Cal.3d at pp. 906-907; People v. Wilshire Ins. Co. (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 521, 535.) Regardless of what the court's docket or the judgment reflect, this is precisely what the court did in this case.

Other Questions


Does a defendant who pleads not guilty by reason of insanity have to plead not guilty to the same charge under section 1016 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
Is a sentence for failing to attend a joint hearing on two separate charges under section 654 of the California Penal Code against a defendant convicted of failing to appear at the hearing of both insufficient funds cases? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant plead guilty to two or more different criminal charges under section 954 of the California Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the Penal Code section 54 of the Criminal Code apply to a defendant who pleaded guilty to two counts of assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 1192.5 of the California Penal Code on a plea where a defendant has pleaded guilty to a charge of assault? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of a lesser included crime of the same crime under both sections of the California Penal Code and Section 654 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of failing to comply with the terms of a conditional discharge from a plea agreement? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 1192.5 of the California Penal Code on a plea where a defendant has pleaded guilty to a charge of assault? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant plead guilty as charged under section 415 of the California Penal Code for engaging in tumultuous And offensive conduct? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.