When a defendant commits both burglary and the underlying intended felony against a single victim, does section 654 of the California Criminal Code permit punishment for both crimes?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Alonzo, D059149 (Cal. App. 2013):

When a defendant commits both burglary and the underlying intended felony against a single victim, section 654 generally permits punishment for one of the crimes, but not for both, because the burglary is merely incident to, and a means of perpetrating, the intended felony. (See People v. James (1977) 19 Cal.3d 99, 119-120 [burglary and intended robbery]; see also People v. Cline (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1327, 1335 [burglary and intended theft].)

Page 38

Other Questions


When a defendant commits both burglary and intended robbery against a single victim, does section 654 of the California Criminal Code permit punishment for one crime but not for the other? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by section 654 of the California Criminal Code for gross negligence punishable by a single crime arising from two crimes arising from a single, indivisible course of conduct? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, allow a single offender to be punished for a single crime committed against a multiple victim? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code preclude punishment for both burglary and theft where the crime was committed based on intent to commit the crime? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by section 654 (a) of the Criminal Code of Ontario's Criminal Code punishable by Section 654, subdivision (a), punishable by the same law, punishable by a different law? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code require a defendant to be convicted of a single crime committed by a single criminal objective? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant who has committed a crime before the crime has been committed? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who commits the crime of grand theft auto in violation of section 487, subdivision (d) of section 666.5 of the California Criminal Code, be convicted of the crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.