What rules apply to "elements" of a trial court's instruction to a jury?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Winslow, 19 Cal.App.4th 1775, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 327 (Cal. App. 1993):

[19 Cal.App.4th 855] "The trial court must instruct even without request on the general principles of law relevant to and governing the case. [Citation.] That obligation includes instructions on all elements of a charged offense. [Citation.]" (People v. Cummings (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1233, 1312, 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 796, 850 P.2d 1.) These rules apply to the "elements" of an "enhancement." 7 Contrary to respondent's request, we cannot "save" this judgment on a harmless error analysis.

The cases do not suggest "... that a harmless error analysis may be applied to instructional error which withdraws from jury consideration substantially all of the elements of an offense...." (People v. Cummings, supra, 4 Cal.4th at p. 1315, 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 796, 850 P.2d 1.) This rule applies to "enhancements." Here the instructional error withdrew from jury considerations substantially all of the elements of the enhancements. The sole instruction given ( ante, p. 331, fn. 5) was, in essence, only a re-reading of the information. This was tantamount to a complete

Page 332

Other Questions


What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Is giving the instruction to the jury too late in the trial of a defendant a breach of the law, or does the court have a duty to properly instruct the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court's instructions to the jury that the jury must conclusively accept the previous jury's finding that defendant's guilt has already been decided? (California, United States of America)
When there is evidence of an accomplice giving instructions to a jury in a criminal case, what is the duty of the trial court to give the jury instructions? (California, United States of America)
Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)
What is the harmless error analysis that a reviewing court should use when a trial court's jury instructions incorrectly define an element of a charged offense? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have to consider whether a jury has been instructed to disregard an instruction from the Court of Appeal that is not supported by how the jury views the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the written and oral versions of jury instructions in a jury trial and the written version of the instructions given to the jury? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury be found to have found an omitted element in a jury instruction where the jury could not have rationally found the omitted element unproven? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.