What rights does a defendant have to counsel at trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Espinoza, F072381 (Cal. App. 2016):

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a defendant with the right to counsel. The "Due Process Clauses" entitles a defendant to a fair trial. The constitution defines the parameters of a fair trial "largely through the several provisions of the Sixth Amendment." (Strickland v. Washington (1984) 466 U.S. 668, 685.) "Thus, a fair trial is one in which evidence subject to adversarial testing is presented to an impartial tribunal for resolution of issues defined in advance of the proceeding. The right to counsel plays a crucial role in the adversarial system embodied in the Sixth Amendment, since access to counsel's skill and knowledge is necessary to accord

Page 9

defendants the 'ample opportunity to meet the case of the prosecution' to which they are entitled." (Ibid.)

A defendant is entitled to have counsel appointed to represent him or her if he or she cannot afford to retain counsel. (Strickland v. Washington, supra, 466 U.S. at p. 685.) Not only is a defendant entitled to counsel, he or she is entitled to effective assistance of that counsel. (Id. at p. 686.) Counsel may be ineffective by failing to render adequate legal assistance. (Ibid.) "A convicted defendant's claim that counsel's assistance was so defective as to require reversal of a conviction or death sentence has two components. First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient. This requires showing that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the 'counsel' guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment. Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This requires showing that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable. Unless a defendant makes both showings, it cannot be said that the conviction or death sentence resulted from a breakdown in the adversary process that renders the result unreliable." (Id. at p. 687.)

Other Questions


When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant makes a motion for a continuance of trial on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, is it appropriate to appoint a new counsel to prepare the motion? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court erred by failing to give a defendant separate advisement of his right to counsel and obtaining a waiver of that right? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a defendant's absolute right to counsel and his unqualified constitutional right to discharge counsel if he pleases and represents himself? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is represented by counsel during the first part of a criminal trial invoke his right to self-representation mid-trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who failed to object at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct on appeal argue that counsel's inaction violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.