California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Evans, C083690 (Cal. App. 2018):
Defendant has a constitutional and statutory right to present a closing argument. (Herring v. New York (1975) 422 U.S. 853, 865 [45 L.Ed.2d 593, 595, 602]; 1093, subd. (e).) As a matter of constitutional law, however, the trial court has "great latitude" in limiting the scope of closing argument. (Herring, at p. 862 [45 L.Ed.2d at p. 600].) The trial judge may "terminate argument when continuation would be repetitive or redundant. He [or she] may ensure that argument does not stray unduly from the mark, or
Page 11
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.