What issues have counsel considered to assist the court in its independent review?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Bowen, G042730, No. 08NF3418 (Cal. App. 2010):
Pursuant to Anders v. State of California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel has suggested four potential issues to assist the court in its independent review. As explained below, we have considered these issues and conclude none are arguable.
Page 4
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
What are two "arguable issues" that the court will consider in its independent review? (California, United States of America)
Does a review court need to consider arguments not advanced in the trial, not in the opinion of the Review Court? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal consider an issue raised in a reply brief of an appellant before the reviewing court? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of the appellant's appeal against a finding that counsel provided ineffective assistance and ineffective assistance to counsel? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of ineffective assistance claims in the context of an ineffective assistance claim? (California, United States of America)
Does section 7895 of the California Family Code require an appellate court to appoint counsel for a parent unable to afford counsel for their child who is a dependent child of the juvenile court? (California, United States of America)
Can a court's frustration and irritation at counsel's repeated efforts to violate evidentiary rules be viewed as "friction between court and counsel"? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does this court have jurisdiction to review or overturn a preliminary injunction issued by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
