What is the waiver rule when there is no timely objection to the actions of the trial judge in eliciting new evidence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Coit Drapery Cleaners, Inc. v. Sequoia Ins. Co., 14 Cal.App.4th 1595, 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 692 (Cal. App. 1993):

It is hornbook law that a timely and specific objection is required to prevent the consideration of certain evidence; the failure to object at all waives any claim of error. (See, e.g., People v. Corrigan (1957) 48 Cal.2d 551, 556, 310 P.2d 953 [The waiver rule also applies when there is no timely objection to the actions of the trial judge in eliciting new evidence.].) Any error here was waived. (Evid.Code, 353, subd. (a).)

Other Questions


In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a trial judge to proceed with the trial of a defendant under section 1368 of the California Mental Health Act if the trial judge receives the reports of two psychiatrists? (California, United States of America)
Does evidence that violates Evidence Code section 1150 need to be objected at trial to preserve the contention on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a reciprocal obligation to disclose all relevant evidence obtained before trial, including rebuttal evidence it intends to use at trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a trial judge that commences a jury trial be prevented from proceeding until the trial is over? (California, United States of America)
What is the rule that a party must submit an objection at a later trial, even though the objection had been overruled at a previous trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances of the crime scene evidence will be admitted during the penalty phase of a penalty trial, does the trial court error not to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
Will questions relating to the admissibility of evidence be reviewed on appeal in the absence of a specific and timely objection in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.