What is the totality of the evidence against defendant in his possession of a controlled substance?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Morales, 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 582, 18 P.3d 11, 25 Cal.4th 34 (Cal. 2001):

15. Considering the totality of this evidence, even in the light most favorable to the judgment below, I find it fails to "disclose[] substantial evidencethat is, evidence which is reasonable, credible, and of solid value such that a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." (People v. Johnson (1980) 26 Cal.3d 557, 578, 162 Cal.Rptr. 431, 606 P.2d 738.) The prosecution made no serious attempt, apart from relying on defendant's state of intoxication, to establish the elements of possession of a controlled substance according to the foregoing standard.

Other Questions


Is possession of a controlled substance necessarily included in a charge of possessing the same controlled substance for the purpose of sale? (California, United States of America)
Is possession of a controlled substance for the sole purpose of disposing of it a defense to criminal possession of the controlled substance? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of resentencing on the charge of possession of a firearm and a controlled substance possession count, can a defendant appeal against his sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any evidence that a defendant's probation sentence for possession of a controlled substance was served concurrently with that same conviction? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant is convicted of possession of two or more "batches" of a single controlled substance under section 654 of the California Controlled Substitute Act, can he receive a concurrent or consecutive sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's right to a jury trial violated by the imposition of the upper term sentence for possessing a controlled substance for sale? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's criminal conviction for grand theft and possession of a controlled substance reduced to a misdemeanor under Proposition 47? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that Weizoerick and Ahlo opined the drugs were possessed for sale rather than personal use, rather than possession, are sufficient evidence to convict a defendant of a drug offence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where evidence of a defendant's plan to sell controlled substances was not admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's argument that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for possession of drugs and possession of a firearm? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.