The following excerpt is from Heldt v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., Case No. 16-cv-00885-BAS-NLS (S.D. Cal. 2017):
The first part of this inquiry is whether the state law has a "reference to" an employee benefit plan. Paulsen, 559 F.3d at 1082. "To determine whether a law has a forbidden 'reference to' ERISA plans," the court considers "whether (1) the law 'acts immediately and exclusively upon ERISA plans,' or (2) 'the existence of ERISA plans is essential to the law's operation.'" Id. (quoting Golden Gate Rest. Ass'n v. City & Cty. of S.F., 546 F.3d 639, 657 (9th Cir. 2008)).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.