What is the test for waiving a claim for fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Cortes v. 21ST Century Fox Am., Inc., No. 18-0414-cv (2nd Cir. 2018):
claim for fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation. Accordingly, he has waived any appeal as to these claims. See, e.g., Norton v. Sam's Club, 145 F.3d 114, 117 (2d Cir. 1998) ("Issues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered waived and normally will not be addressed on appeal.")
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts dealt with claims of breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentation, false advertising and unjust enrichment claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim of fraud under the Federal Fraud Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the statute of fraud in cases involving fraud claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the appeal from a dismissal of claim against several defendants for alleged fraud arising from the adjudication of a claim for damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff in two industrial accidents? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the purchaser-seller standing limitation of Rule 10b-5 apply to a RICO claim when the act of fraud is based on acts of securities fraud? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between a claim of fraudulent inducement and a conspiracy to commit fraud? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
