The following excerpt is from People v. Tapia, 100 N.Y.S.3d 660, 124 N.E.3d 210, 33 N.Y.3d 257 (N.Y. 2019):
The statute's "three carefully worded and enumerated exceptions" to the use of prior testimony of an unavailable declarant are essentially exclusive ( People v. Ayala, 75 N.Y.2d 422, 429, 554 N.Y.S.2d 412, 553 N.E.2d 960 [1990] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted] ), but we have recognized certain "exceptions" predicated on either the forfeiture or inapplicability of the defendant's right to confrontation of the declarant. In the case of a
[100 N.Y.S.3d 667]
[124 N.E.3d 217]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.