The following excerpt is from People v. Dunn, 563 N.Y.S.2d 388, 564 N.E.2d 1054, 77 N.Y.2d 19 (N.Y. 1990):
5 The "use of [the] dog [was] not a mere improvement of [the officer's] sense of smell, as ordinary eyeglasses improve vision, but [was] a significant enhancement accomplished by a different, and far superior, sensory instrument." (United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1367.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.