The following excerpt is from Argueta v. I.N.S., 759 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1985):
Factual findings by the Immigration Judge in a deportation proceeding must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence. Zepeda-Melendez v. INS, 741 F.2d 285, 289 (9th Cir.1984). Here the Immigration Judge found petitioner's allegations of threats of persecution lacking credibility. The majority has chosen to substitute its own findings of fact for those of the Immigration Judge. According the deference owed the findings of the Immigration Judge, I conclude that he did not err in concluding that petitioner's allegations did not demonstrate either a clear probability of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.