The following excerpt is from Armstrong v. Asuncion, Case No. 1:15-cv-01109-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. 2020):
First, Madera County found the petition untimely. California's timeliness rule is clearly established and not interwoven with federal law. See Walker v. Martin, 562 U.S. 307, 317 (2011). California applies a "reasonableness standard" to judge whether a habeas petition is timely; a habeas petition must be filed without "substantial delay." Id. at 397. A "reasonable time" to file is generally less than 60 days. See Evans v. Chavis, 546 U.S. 189, 201 (2006). Here,
Page 10
petitioner's state-level habeas petition was filed in July 2015, nearly four years after his December 2011 sentencing.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.