What is the test for the interpretation of words in a statute?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Sharif, D061508 (Cal. App. 2013):

It is well-established that words used in a statute "'"must be construed in context, and statutes must be harmonized, both internally and with each other, to the extent possible."'" (People v. Loeun (1997) 17 Cal.4th 1, 9.) Furthermore, effect must be given to every word, clause and sentence of a statute, if possible. A statute "'should be construed so that effect is given to all its provisions, so that no part will be inoperative or superfluous, void or insignificant, and so that one section will not destroy another unless the provision is the result of obvious mistake or error.'" (Rodriguez v. Superior Court (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 1260, 1269.)

Other Questions


Can a defense interpreter only interpret words of the witness interpreter at trial? (California, United States of America)
When an agency adopts a new interpretation of a statute and rejects an old interpretation of the statute? (California, United States of America)
When harmonizing two statutes relating to the same subject, can a particular or specific statute take precedence over a conflicting general statute? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpreting the meaning of the word "reasonable and common sense interpretation" in the context of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
Is section 1001.36 of the California Criminal Code a "stressed interpretation" of the law and, if so, would it be impertinent for the court to place a strained interpretation upon the statute? (California, United States of America)
Does the rule against interpreting statutory language "in a manner that would render some part of the statute surplusage" support a different interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted or interpreted the word "or" and "and" in legislation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "judicial interpretation" in municipal law? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.