The following excerpt is from Diaz v. Satf-Sp, Case No.: 1:12-cv-00399 JLT - HC (E.D. Cal. 2014):
Where there is a claim that the court or the prosecutor interfered with the witness' voluntary choice whether to testify, only will a "substantial" interference with a witnesses' decision implicate the defendant's rights. United States v. Vavages, 151 F.3d 1185, 1189 (9th Cir. 1998). If a judge's advisal to a witness is threatening or coercive, the defendant is deprived of due process if the witness is "effectively driven off the stand." Webb v. Texas, 409 U.S. 95, 98 (1972). Where the prosecutor's
Page 8
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.