California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Richards v. CH2m Hill, 94 Cal.Rptr.2d 228 (Cal. App. 2000):
2. Since we are assessing the sufficiency of the evidence to establish timely claims, the facts are set forth in the light most favorable to plaintiff, unless specified otherwise. (Nestle v. City of Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920, 925.)
2. Since we are assessing the sufficiency of the evidence to establish timely claims, the facts are set forth in the light most favorable to plaintiff, unless specified otherwise. (Nestle v. City of Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920, 925.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.