What is the test for Section 1985(2) of the Federal Trade Commission to prevent a witness from attending court?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hollomon v. Cnty. of San Diego, Case No.: 3:18-CV-00528-L-NLS (S.D. Cal. 2018):
In order to state a claim under Section 1985(2), as Plaintiff purports to do, Plaintiff must show "(1) a conspiracy between two or more persons, (2) to deter a witness by force, intimidation or threat from attending court or testifying freely in any pending matter, which (3) results in injury to the plaintiff." David v. U.S., 820 F.2d 1038, 1040 (9th Cir. 1987).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does Section 5G1.3 of the Federal Guidelines for Federal Sentences apply to a defendant who is convicted of a federal charge of possession of a firearm by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a plaintiff fails to state a claim under section 1986 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, can he continue to sue the federal government for damages? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court grant relief under Section 2254 or Section 2255 of the US Constitution for the purposes of habeas corpus relief on the basis that evidence obtained in an unconstitutional search or seizure was introduced at a state or federal trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal test for determining whether a claim has been adjudicated "on the merits" by a state court for purposes of Section 2254(d)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear a claim brought by a former employee of the Federal Trade Commission against the Federal Reserve? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does an order based on a committee recommendation fall within the immunity provisions of section 608b of the Federal Trade Commission Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
