What is the test for rule of evidence in a personal injury case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Esparza, F061144 (Cal. App. 2012):
The rule of Evidence Code section 354 "is necessary because, among other things, the reviewing court must know the substance of the excluded evidence in order to assess prejudice. [Citations.]" (People v. Anderson (2001) 25 Cal.4th 543, 580-581.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of Evidence Code section 664 of the California Evidence Code on the burden of proof in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making a motion for personal injury representation in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What are some examples of high-profile personal injury cases involving personal injury? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, can a plaintiff hire an attorney to prosecute the personal injury suit? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence in the context of evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
