California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Shank v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc., G049844 (Cal. App. 2015):
The court relied on proper legal standards. Thus we look to whether its decision "'"'falls within the permissible range of options set by the legal criteria.'"'" (Robbins v. Alibrandi (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 438, 452.) There is no basis to reverse unless "the amount awarded is so large or small that it shocks the conscience and
Page 32
suggests that passion and prejudice influenced the determination." (Akins v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. (2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 1127, 1134.) There is nothing to suggest that here.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.