What is the test for reversal of a finding that the trial court erred by not holding a hearing on a motion of appeal?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Le, D057392, Super. Ct. No. SCD212126 (Cal. App. 2012):
Moreover, even if we concluded the trial court erred by not holding such a hearing, we would further conclude that error does not require reversal. (See People v.
Page 25
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a defendant appeal against a finding that a motion to suppress evidence was successful because the trial court did not retain the exhibits introduced during the combined preliminary hearing and hearing on the motion? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion to appeal a postconviction finding that the trial court lacks jurisdiction to hear the motion be appealed? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion of appeal against a finding that the trial court erred in failing to grant a new trial on the grounds of misconduct of counsel? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appeal against a finding that a trial court's ruling on a motion of appeal was 'unlawful, arbitrary, capricious or patently absurd'? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have found that Defendant Joiner did not waive his assumed constitutional right to be personally present at the remand hearing and that the court erred in conducting that hearing in his absence? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, is the trial court bound by the same principles as the court of appeal? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to dismiss one or both of appellant's prior strike convictions, can appellant appeal against the finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
