What is the test for retaining jurisdiction over a state law claim?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Ransom v. McCabe, 1:13cv01779 AWI DLB PC (E.D. Cal. 2014):

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a), in any civil action in which the district court has original jurisdiction, the district court "shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III," except as provided in subsections (b) and (c). "[O]nce judicial power exists under 1367(a), retention of supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims under 1367(c) is discretionary." Acri v. Varian Assoc., Inc., 114 F.3d 999, 1000 (9th Cir.1997).

Other Questions


When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek a federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When two state procedural bars are invoked in a single order disposing of multiple claims in a personal injury case, can the state be deemed to be inconsistent with the other state? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for retaining supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims in a civil action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for retaining jurisdiction over state law claims in a civil action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a federal district court have jurisdiction to remand a state claim to the state court from which it was removed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a state law insurer exercise discretion to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.