California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Goldberg v. Frye, 217 Cal.App.3d 1258, 266 Cal.Rptr. 483 (Cal. App. 1990):
The predominant inquiry, Mallen states, is whether the principal purpose of the attorney's retention is to provide legal services for the benefit of the plaintiff. For example, the intention of a testator to benefit legatees, through the retention of an attorney to draft his will, can confer a cause of action in favor of a disappointed legatee against the negligent draftsman. (See, e.g., Lucas v. Hamm (1961) 56 Cal.2d 583, 15 Cal.Rptr. 821, 364 P.2d 685; Biakanja v. Irving (1958) 49 Cal.2d 647, 320 P.2d 16.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.