What is the test for replacing a defense counsel with a Marsden?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Ruffin, F069406 (Cal. App. 2017):
In conducting a Marsden hearing, the trial court must ascertain the nature of the defendant's allegations and decide whether the allegations have sufficient substance to warrant replacement of defense counsel. The trial court must give the defendant an appropriate opportunity to set forth the complaints regarding counsel's representation and allow counsel to respond. (People v. Alfaro (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1277, 1320.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
Is it misconduct for a prosecutor to imply that defense counsel has fabricated evidence or otherwise to portray defense counsel as the villain in the case? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor commit misconduct if he or she attacks the integrity of defense counsel or casts aspersions on defense counsel? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor asks a defense counsel a question in voir dire about rape and sexual assault, is the defense counsel's failure to object to the questions? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor impugently call the integrity of defense counsel by asserting defense counsel would lose their bar cards if they argued in favor of voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Can defense counsel argue that defense counsel failed to object to the foregoing procedure or request that written instructions be provided to the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does trial counsel shirk his constitutional responsibility to provide competent counsel by failing to ask the court to instruct on a bogus self-defense defense? (California, United States of America)
Is it generally improper for a prosecutor to accuse defense counsel of fabricating a defense, or to imply that counsel is free to deceive the jury? (California, United States of America)
