California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Amouchal v. Kutyba, B284389 (Cal. App. 2019):
Here, the parties did not stipulate to forgo oral testimony and the court made no finding of good cause for refusing to receive live testimony. The court was thus required to receive any live, competent testimony that was relevant and within the scope of the hearing. ( 217; cf. Nora v. Kaddo (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 1026, 1028-1029 [based on analogous language in Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6, court erred by denying parties the opportunity to present live testimony].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.