California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Johnson, F073002 (Cal. App. 2018):
Rodrigues, supra, 8 Cal.4th at pp. 1124-1125; see People v. Williams, supra, 17 Cal.4th at p. 162 [abuse of discretion review asks whether ruling in question falls outside bounds of reason under applicable law and relevant facts].)
Appellant contends it was "reasonably necessary" to question juror 3136430 when she appeared at the courthouse. He notes that defense counsel neither requested this juror's personal contact information nor wanted to interview her in a private setting. He maintains her testimony would not have intruded on privacy rights, and the court, as opposed to counsel, could have asked the questions about misconduct. Appellant argues that, balancing the competing interests, the court should have invited the juror into the courtroom for further inquiry or compelled her testimony if she was unwilling. He relies primarily on People v. Tuggles (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 339 (Tuggles) to establish error. We find appellant's arguments and his reliance on Tuggles unconvincing.
When possible juror misconduct is discovered, a trial court must make whatever inquiry is "'"reasonably necessary"'" to resolve the issue. (People v. Hayes, supra, 21 Cal.4th at p. 1255.) When allegations of juror misconduct raise a presumption of prejudice, the court may conduct an evidentiary hearing and take testimony from jurors to determine whether a new trial motion should be granted. Such a hearing may occur if the court concludes it is necessary to resolve material, disputed issues of fact. (Ibid.)
Strong public policies protect discharged jurors from improperly intrusive conduct. (Townsel v. Superior Court, supra, 20 Cal.4th at p. 1092.) Under Code of Civil Procedure section 206, juror consent is required before the parties may contact a juror after trial. (Code Civ. Proc., 206, subd. (b).) The disclosure of a juror's personal identifying information is controlled by Code of Civil Procedure section 237, which requires a petition supported by a declaration establishing good cause. (Code Civ. Proc., 237, subd. (b).) Protection of a juror's privacy, however, must be balanced with the
Page 27
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.