What is the test for "reasonable evidence" in a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Migoya, C087345 (Cal. App. 2020):
" 'evidence from which a jury composed of reasonable [persons] could . . . conclude[]' " that the lesser offense, but not the greater, was committed.' " (People v. Moye (2009) 47 Cal.4th 537, 553.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of a person's character or trait of his or her character in a civil case admissible in the context of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does a common law rule barring the admission of hearsay evidence in a civil case affect the reliability of evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the defense meet the reasonable diligence and reasonable diligence requirements of a jury in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor in a civil case argue to a jury that it can find a defendant guilty based on a reasonable account of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a court's decision to remove the exclusion of evidence from evidence in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
