What is the test for proving falsity in a statement?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Med. Marijuana, Inc. v. Projectcbd.com, 260 Cal.Rptr.3d 237, 46 Cal.App.5th 869 (Cal. App. 2020):

and apparent object of the writer, considering not only the actual language used, but the sense and meaning that may be fairly presumed to have been conveyed to those who read it. [Citation.]" ( Selleck v. Globe International, Inc. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 1123, 1131, 212 Cal.Rptr. 838.) In addition, falsity cannot be shown if the statement at issue appears substantially true : "To bar liability, "it is sufficient if the substance of the charge be proved true, irrespective of slight inaccuracy in the details." [Citations.] ... [Citation.] ... Minor inaccuracies do not amount to falsity so long as "the substance, the gist, the sting, of the libelous charge be justified." [Citations.] Put another way, the statement is not considered false unless it "would have a different effect on the mind of the reader from that which the pleaded truth would have produced." [Citations.] [Citation.]" ( Vogel v. Felice (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1006, 1021, 26 Cal.Rptr.3d 350 ( Vogel ), italics omitted.)

[260 Cal.Rptr.3d 254]

Other Questions


What is the burden of proving the falsity of statements? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between statements made by a defendant at the time of a search for illegal drugs in his bedroom closet and statements made during the search? (California, United States of America)
Does Counsel's statements imply that Counsel never stated whether a witness's statement was made in connection with the matter on which counsel represented her? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant have to prove that he was unlawfully detained and denied a right to make a statement? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant's extrajudicial statements form part of the prosecution's evidence, does the trial court have to instruct sua sponte that a finding of guilt cannot be predicated on the statements alone? (California, United States of America)
Is an improper statement in a jury trial admissible to show the effect on the jurors' mental processes of other, improper statements? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving an affiant's knowledge of falsity? (California, United States of America)
Can expert testimony be used to assist the jury in determining whether a statement or series of statements implied defamatory facts? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that a statement made by a witness was voluntary? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant use the introduction of his out-of-court statements as an opportunity to introduce "extraneous statements" that might favor him? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.