The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Agapito, 620 F.2d 324 (2nd Cir. 1980):
We turn next to appellants' contentions that their arrests were illegal for lack of probable cause. The applicable standard is well settled, namely, that "probable cause to arrest exists when an officer has knowledge of facts and circumstances 'sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing' that an offense is being or has been committed." United States v. Rueda, 549 F.2d 865, 870 (2 Cir. 1977) (quoting Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 91 (1964)). Applying that standard to the facts of this case, we hold that there was probable cause for appellants' arrests.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.