What is the test for pleading for a cause of action under Title 42 of the United States Code?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Peter Fong S v. Jones, B219408, No. BC397017 (Cal. App. 2011):

The requirements for pleading for a cause of action under title 42 of the United States Code section 1983 are limited: a plaintiff must allege a deprivation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States or federal law, and that the deprivation was committed by a person who was acting under color of state law. (West v. Atkins (1998) 487 U.S. 42, 48.) At the same time, however, the decisional law recognizes a "qualified immunity" that protects against the concern that officers may be chilled in their daily pursuit of investigations and arrests. Otherwise, any person could bring an officer into a lawsuit to extract vengeance for arrest. This qualified immunity protects officers not only against trial and judgment, but also the chilling effect that would be caused by the expense of litigation. (Harlow v. Fitzgerald (1982) 457 U.S. 800, 816819.) For these reasons, and "[c]onsistent[] with the balance [implicated in an action under title 42 of the United States Code section 1983], bare allegations of malice should not suffice to subject government officials either to the costs of trial or to the burdens of

Page 9

Other Questions


In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion for judgment on the pleadings appropriate when the complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
What causes of action can a plaintiff bring in a common law cause of action for emotional distress and wrongful discharge? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for pleading not stating "facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action"? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion for judgment on the pleadings appropriate when the complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion for judgment on the pleadings appropriate when the complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion for judgment on the pleadings appropriate when the complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an inverse condemnation action against a governmental entity for damage caused to private property caused by a governmental action? (California, United States of America)
When a pleading contains an allegation that is destructive to a cause of action, can the appellant omit it in later pleadings? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion for judgment on the pleadings appropriate when the complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.