What is the test for personal injury based on public nuisance?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp., 227 Cal.App.3d 1248, 278 Cal.Rptr. 395 (Cal. App. 1991):

6 We have no occasion to examine claims for personal injury based on public nuisance. (But see Nestle v. City of Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920, 937-938, 101 Cal.Rptr. 568, 496 P.2d 480.)

Other Questions


Is a public entity or a public employee liable under government code section 830.30.6 for injuries sustained by a person who was injured in a motor vehicle accident as a result of injuries sustained while driving under a traffic light? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated personal injury claims based on public nuisance? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
What are some examples of high-profile personal injury cases involving personal injury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a plaintiff to bring a personal injury action under a statutory change in the law governing personal injury actions? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, can a plaintiff hire an attorney to prosecute the personal injury suit? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.