What is the test for overturning a judgment in a sexual assault case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Resendez, 13 Cal.App.5th 181, 220 Cal.Rptr.3d 118 (Cal. App. 2017):

judgment to determine whether it contains substantial evidencethat is, evidence that is reasonable, credible, and of solid valuefrom which a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citation.] We presume every fact in support of the judgment the trier of fact could have reasonably deduced from the evidence. [Citation.] If the circumstances reasonably justify the trier of fact's findings, reversal of the judgment is not warranted simply because the circumstances might also reasonably be reconciled with a contrary finding." ( People v. Albillar (2010) 51 Cal.4th 47, 59-60, 119 Cal.Rptr.3d 415, 244 P.3d 1062.)

Other Questions


What is the relevant case law regarding allegations of sexual assault made against appellant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissibility of evidence of prior sexual assault in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting prior sexual assault evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for overturning a judgment in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for overturning a judgment of a jury in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, is a defendant more culpable in committing two acts of sodomy than if they committed only one act of sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, is it possible for a defendant to sexually assault two women by touching their genitals? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
When a photograph of a defendant in a sexual assault case was found to have been taken in the context of an alleged sexual assault, is there any connection to the subsequent verdict of attempted sodomy? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.