What is the test for overturning a finding that forced oral copulation occurred on separate occasions?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Wright, C072781 (Cal. App. 2015):
In reviewing whether there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court's determination that the four incidents of forced oral copulation occurred on separate occasions, this court is " 'not at liberty to overturn the result unless no reasonable trier of fact could decide that there was a reasonable opportunity for reflection.' " (People v.
Page 32
Pena, supra, 7 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1314-1315, quoting People v. Corona, supra, 206 Cal.App.3d at p. 18, fn. 2.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a court have to find that the probation officer made an error in finding that the violation constituting count 4 occurred on a separate occasion? (California, United States of America)
Is it ineffective defense counsel for failing to alert the court that not all 12 oral copulation counts occurred on separate occasions? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal in a motion to overturn a finding of not guilty of sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to find that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that defendants would have or should have known that retaliation was likely to occur? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports a finding that defendant used force on at least one occasion to commit a lewd and lascivious act against his daughter? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversing a finding that a defendant committed offenses on separate occasions? (California, United States of America)
What is the test applied by the Court of Appeal to determine whether multiple sexual offences occurred on separate occasions for purposes of imposing full consecutive terms? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for overturning a finding that a jury could reasonably justify the jury's findings? (California, United States of America)
Does Counsel have an obligation to make a fact-specific analysis of the evidence to explain its basis for finding each offense was committed on a separate occasion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversing a finding that a defendant committed offenses on separate occasions? (California, United States of America)
