What is the test for opposing a motion in a personal injury case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Simons v. Steverson, 106 Cal.Rptr.2d 193, 88 Cal. App. 4th 693 (Cal. App. 2001):

On March 6, 2000, plaintiffs filed their opposition. They argued that defendants' representation of plaintiffs constituted the practice of law in California (Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior Court (1998) 17 Cal.4th 119) and that "defendants have similarly practiced law in California on behalf of five other California residents during the relevant period."

Other Questions


How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion for personal injury relief in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making a motion for personal injury representation in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.