California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from 200 Arguello Assocs., LLC v. Dyas, A145533 (Cal. App. 2017):
11. Holden v. Arnebergh, supra, 265 Cal.App.2d at pages 91-92, did not impose a requirement of "more effective" relief; it applied the principle that "the court does not abuse its discretion in refusing to entertain [a declaratory relief] action where otherwise plaintiff has a speedy and adequate remedy."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.