What is the test for making an objection at a deportation hearing?

--------

Notes:

1 United States ex rel. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 187 F.2d 137, 140, affirmed 342 U.S. 580; 72 S.Ct. 512, 8 C.F.R. 151.2(a) to (d). And relator is not in a position to assert that, independently of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. 1001 et seq., he was denied due process since no objection was made at the hearing. See Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580, 583, n. 4, 72 S.Ct. 512.

2 There is such a requirement at the investigative stage of the proceedings, 8 C.F.R. 150.1(c) (2), but relator's statements here were made at the deportation hearing.

3 United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 155, 44 S.Ct. 54, 68 L.Ed. 221.

4 See Kwock Jan Fat v. White, 253 U.S. 454, 459, 40 S.Ct. 566, 64 L.Ed. 1010; Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 157, 44 S.Ct. 54, 68 L.Ed. 221.

Notes:

1 United States ex rel. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 187 F.2d 137, 140, affirmed 342 U.S. 580; 72 S.Ct. 512, 8 C.F.R. 151.2(a) to (d). And relator is not in a position to assert that, independently of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. 1001 et seq., he was denied due process since no objection was made at the hearing. See Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580, 583, n. 4, 72 S.Ct. 512.

2 There is such a requirement at the investigative stage of the proceedings, 8 C.F.R. 150.1(c) (2), but relator's statements here were made at the deportation hearing.

3 United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 155, 44 S.Ct. 54, 68 L.Ed. 221.